Reviewed September 7, 2026.
New York construction trust obligations require more than keeping enough money in a bank account. A trustee needs records showing the source of trust assets, obligations to beneficiaries and the purpose of each expenditure.
Identify the trust and its assets
Lien Law § 70 defines separate owner, contractor and subcontractor trusts. Assets can include both funds received and rights to payment. A trust can arise before any beneficiary’s claim presently exists. Identify the particular contract, improvement, trustee and assets instead of assuming every unpaid invoice proves diversion.
Separate project records; bank accounts may be shared
Section 75 expressly permits funds of different trusts in one bank account if the records clearly allocate deposits and withdrawals to each trust. It does not impose a universal requirement for a specially titled trust account or a separate bank account for every job. A separate account may be a useful control, but it does not replace the statutory books and records.
The records must cover more than a bank balance. Maintain the required information for:
- Trust assets receivable: the person owing payment, identifying transaction, amount and due date.
- Trust accounts payable: beneficiaries, obligations, amounts and dates due.
- Funds received: source, date, amount, form of receipt and deposit information.
- Payments made: recipient, date, amount, method, trust purpose and relevant contract or work details.
- Applicable lending transactions: advances, transfers, assignments and the information required for a notice-of-lending arrangement.
Keep supporting contracts, invoices, payroll records, payment applications, bank records, checks and allocation schedules. Reconcile each project ledger regularly.
Use assets for that trust’s purposes
Section 71 defines permitted expenditures and beneficiaries; qualifying labor, materials and certain project taxes, insurance and bond costs may be included. Using one project’s trust assets for another job or taking profit before the trust obligations are satisfied can create diversion liability under § 72.
For example, if Project X receives $100,000 and pays $75,000 in proper trust expenses, the $25,000 bank balance is not automatically profit. Determine outstanding and potential trust obligations and whether the trust has terminated before releasing remaining assets. If a Project X beneficiary remains unpaid, using that balance to purchase Project Z materials may constitute diversion.
Respond to beneficiary requests
Under § 76, an eligible beneficiary may choose inspection and copying of trust records or a verified statement. The statute generally allows a request after a claim has been payable for 30 days, no more often than monthly, and provides a ten-day response period. Proper identification and service are required. A summary saying the owner has not paid does not replace the required records.
Understand the consequences and deadlines
Missing required records creates presumptive evidence of diversion under § 75; it is not an automatic final judgment. Civil remedies can include accounting, recovery of diverted assets and damages. Individuals who participate in a diversion can face personal liability, but corporate status alone does not establish it. Criminal liability under § 79-a has its own requirements and exceptions. Punitive damages and attorney-fee awards are not automatic.
Bankruptcy treatment also requires separate analysis. In Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A., 569 U.S. 267 (2013), the Supreme Court required a culpable mental state for fiduciary defalcation under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4), including knowledge or gross recklessness. It is inaccurate to say every Article 3-A judgment necessarily survives an individual’s bankruptcy.
Section 77 generally limits a trust-enforcement action to one year after completion of the improvement, with a later final-payment-due trigger available to subcontractors and materialmen as stated in the statute. It also provides representative-action requirements and an exception for a trustee’s final-accounting action. Obtain a claim-specific deadline analysis; a records request does not automatically extend the time to sue.
Kushnick Pallaci PLLC assists with construction trust accounting disputes and diversion claims and construction payment litigation. Vincent T. Pallaci is the firm’s managing member. Call 631-752-7100, email vtp@kushnicklaw.com or consult the current Long Island and New York City office information.
Attorney Advertising. General information, not legal advice.
Hi ,,,
ReplyDeleteThis is an interesting article. Question:
If a contractor was unaware of the Lein Law.. and never set up a trust.. the project was completed,, and then less than a year later, the homeowner decides to sue the contractor for the amount,,, using the Lein Law as their suit...
IS there any protection for the contractor?
And what type of ramifications will result in their wording of "larceny",, criminal consequences?"
Please help!?
I will respond to your comment with general information - if you are looking for specific legal advice on a specific set of facts you can contact me at vtp@kushnicklaw.com.
ReplyDeleteIn general terms, a contractor's lack of knowledge of the lien law trust provisions is not a defense to violation of the trust provisions of the Lien Law. Most courts have held that a contractor does not need to set up a separate "trust fund" in order to be in compliance with Lien Law Article 3A. A claim cannot be made against a contractor simply because the contractor failed to set up a separate trust account. The Lien Law trust provisions require the contractor to keep track of certain books and records on a project (See Lien Law Section 75). A beneficiary of the trust that has suffered harm because of a lien law trust violation can bring a claim against the trustee (the contractor) for damages arising out of that violation. Failure to maintain the proper books and records of the trust give rise to an assumption that a violation occurred. The trustee (contractor) can overcome that assumption with evidence but it is very difficult.
If the proper books and records have been maintained then the party seeking damages for an alleged violation must establish a trust violation rather than the violation being presumed.
Violations of Lien Law Article 3A can lead to criminal charges.
Thank you for your reply... I found it very helpful. Your site has been interesting to read.
ReplyDeleteFor government work once a lien is filed what percentage of that lien amount is the government agency legally allowed to withhold?
ReplyDeleteIf a homeowner is in arrears to a contractor for 100K, and then that homeowner gives a check to the contractor for 35K as a deposit toward cabinets,(keep in mind the homeowner is still in arrears 100K) but the contractor sent only half of the cabinet deposit to the cabinet company but the contractor used the remaining cabinet funds for labor and material toward the homeowners project other than cabinets...and over time, the homeowner became in arrears an additional 370K...can the contractor be guilty of lien law violation 3a? (and note, the owner used his personal funds on the project, which I believe is not considered a trust fund asset)
ReplyDeleteYour question is very specific and you need an attorney to look over your books and records to determine if there is a potential trust violation. However, in general, the scenario you laid out does not absolve the contractor from liability under Article 3A. The trustee (contractor) may not use the trust assets for ANY non-trust purpose until all trust liabilities are satisfied. However, the trustee has the freedom to determine the order of trust payments as long as each is a valid trust expenditure. So it is possible that the $35K could be used towards other items. The problem is the designation as a deposit for cabinets. If that was designated specifically for a cabinet, a potential trust diversion exists.
ReplyDeleteAs to the source of the funds, while the home owner is not a trustee because he used his own funds, the money once transferred to the contractor became trust funds for which the contractor is liable as trustee.
I have a complex issue at hand. Because of the complexities, would you be willing to meet with me and consult on the issue?
DeleteE-mail me at vtp@kushnicklaw.com to discuss setting up
ReplyDeleteOne question before I set an appt with you. In another article you wrote about diversion of funds, you wrote the following;
ReplyDelete"Of course not all uses of the trust asset are improper or illegal. So we look to the next element of the Lien Law trust fund diversion claim. That money that the contractor received on Project X must be "used for any purpose other than a trust purpose. The logical question then becomes what is a trust purpose? Lien Law Section 72 points us towards the answer in Lien Law Section 71.
There are two parts of Lien Law Section 71. Sub part 1 of Lien Law Section 71 says that the trust funds that contractor is holding on Project X can be used and applied for "payment of the cost of improvement." Quite simply that means contractor can use the trust funds for Project X to pay for costs of construction on Project X (for example he can use the trust funds to pay for supplies). Sub part 2 of Lien Law Section 71 then gives us a nice list of exactly what types of things the contractor, as trustee, can pay with the Project X trust funds. Section 72(2) says the funds can be used to pay:
(a) payment of claims of subcontractors, architects, engineers, surveyors, laborers and materialmen;"
In your article about diversion of funds, you state that funds for project x must be used on project x.
I did use a portion of cabinet trust funds for project x on project x...Meaning... a deposit was given that was originally slated for cabinets. A portion of the cabinet deposit was used to cover costs for other approved improvements on his project. Costs that I paid out of my pocket to the tune of over 350K of improvements to his house for costs of material and labor on the project and have not yet been paid for.
So I am very confused why you would state using cabinet funds for another approved improvement on his project (especially when he owes me 10 times the amount of the deposit) might be a trust fund violation?